Retailers sense an opening: Despite a still-tight labor market, growing economic uncertainty may tilt the balance of power ever-so-slightly in favor of employers, who can wield the threat of layoffs and reduced pay to keep workers in line.
- For example, Starbucks Workers United accused the coffee chain of closing stores in retaliation for unionizing efforts, per CNBC. The union noted that of 19 Starbucks locations that had closed or were scheduled to shut down, eight had either unionized or were in the process of doing so.
- The threat of job loss at a time of record inflation and rising living costs could act as a significant deterrent for workers thinking about organizing.
Waiting it out: The tactic that’s yielded the most success thus far is stonewalling—which has been particularly effective in industries like retail with high turnover.
-
Only three of the more than 220 Starbucks locations that have successfully unionized have begun negotiations, per Vox.
- Despite unionizing in June, workers at an Austin Starbucks said their efforts to begin bargaining have been ignored, while the store has stopped rehiring returning students in what organizers say is an attempt to “dilute the union effort with new employees.”
- Amazon’s legal challenge could overturn the successful union vote while disillusioning workers unfamiliar with the long, arduous, and contentious process of collective bargaining.
The big takeaway: Given the widespread support for organizing, corporations’ union-busting tactics look like bad PR moves that will haunt their attempts to recruit and retain workers. And with the NLRB becoming more proactive about protecting workers’ rights to unionize, companies may not be able to hide behind legal appeals much longer.
Go further: For more on the future of work, read our Analyst Take.