The news: The vast majority (89%) of US adults use generative AI (genAI), per a Centerfield GenAI Consumer Survey commissioned by Search Engine Land.
But not everyone uses it the same way.
This means brands that aren’t ensuring their content is visible in genAI output are missing out on a large segment of the population.
Optimizing for AI: A separate Centerfield study shared with Search Engine Land found that almost all marketers (93%) are struggling to implement generative engine optimization (GEO).
But it’s not all bad news: 41% expect their companies to devote more resources to GEO in the next year.
A shift in measurement: Key metrics are no longer organic traffic, clickthrough rates, or bounce rates. With GEO, marketers need to focus on how often and where their brands are mentioned in results and how accurate those mentions are.
Our take: Training and education are top next steps. Keyword research will become less important as competitor analysis ramps up. SEO/GEO specialists need to understand specific user needs and the companies surfacing in AI results to adopt their methods.
Chunks of content need to be quotable and easily understood by generative search engines. Minimalistic websites need to ramp up content that’s written conversationally and without filler, whether that’s in product descriptions, “about” pages, or charts and graphics. Use headers, divide content into mods, and as with SEO, constantly monitor performance to make adjustments on the fly.
This content is part of EMARKETER’s subscription Briefings, where we pair daily updates with data and analysis from forecasts and research reports. Our Briefings prepare you to start your day informed, to provide critical insights in an important meeting, and to understand the context of what’s happening in your industry. Non-clients can click here to get a demo of our full platform and coverage.