The news: As generative AI (genAI) tools evolve from chatbots to smarter reasoning models, they seem to be generating more errors with hallucinations—incorrect or fabricated outputs. Error rates are as high as 79% in some tests, more than double the error rate of previous models, per The New York Times.
AI’s reality check: Increased AI hallucinations raise concerns as companies rewrite their entire business models around AI. For example, an AI bot from vibe-coding standout Cursor fabricated a policy change, triggering user backlash and subscription cancellations.
Potential problems: Data training sources are drying up, resulting in regurgitation of data as AI companies struggle to find new sources for model training and methods to make AI smarter.
Brand marketers are worried—35% of them around the globe cite concerns about the reliability of genAI, particularly hallucinations, as the greatest challenge to using genAI in marketing, per Econsultancy.
Our take: Marketers should treat generative AI as a tool, not a source of truth. Verify outputs, use human oversight, and choose platforms built for accuracy. Trust will drive adoption—not hype.
AI’s promise is speed and scale, but without accuracy, it erodes credibility. As genAI transforms customer service, content, and search, catastrophic errors stemming from AI overreliance will hinder adoption and diminish trust.